Use T_UNINIT as lower bound for types #806
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Elazar Gershuni <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve an update to the constant Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/crab/type_encoding.hpp(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/crab/type_encoding.hpp (1)
43-43: Verify TypeGroup behavior with T_UNINIT
The change to include T_UNINIT in the valid range is logical for handling uninitialized values. However, verify that TypeGroup comparisons handle T_UNINIT correctly.
✅ Verification successful
T_UNINIT is handled correctly in TypeGroup comparisons
The codebase shows that TypeGroup comparisons are implemented safely with respect to T_UNINIT:
mem: checksreg >= T_PACKET- unaffected by T_UNINITmem_or_num: checksreg >= T_NUM && reg != T_CTX- unaffected by T_UNINITpointer: checksreg >= T_CTX- unaffected by T_UNINITptr_or_num: checksreg >= T_NUM- unaffected by T_UNINITstack_or_packet: checksreg >= T_PACKET && reg <= T_STACK- unaffected by T_UNINITsingleton_ptr: checksreg >= T_CTX && reg <= T_STACK- unaffected by T_UNINIT
All TypeGroup comparisons use either equality checks or lower bounds that are higher than T_UNINIT (-7), making the change safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if TypeGroup implementations handle T_UNINIT correctly
# Look for comparisons against type_encoding_t values that might need adjustment
# Search for type comparisons in implementation files
rg "T_(UNINIT|MAP_PROGRAMS|NUM|CTX|PACKET|STACK|SHARED)" --type cpp -A 2 -B 2
# Look for TypeGroup-related code
ast-grep --pattern 'TypeGroup'
Length of output: 36886
Fix a crash when running on build/loop.o.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes